Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon with the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated 2-twelve-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
4. Record shows that the petitioner has long been booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in These cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is liable to repeating the offence.
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to carry out absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Reasonable grounds can be obtained around the record to connect the petitioner with the commission from the alleged offence. While punishment on the alleged offence does not drop in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. yet learned Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit from the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls inside the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steerage has long been sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for the loss of a life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment within the offender, guaranteeing These are held accountable for their actions.
Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Pakistani legal citations typically incorporate the year, court, and case number. Familiarizing yourself with this format will help you rapidly Track down the cases you need. Several free case regulation websites allow you to search directly using citations.
The law of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
In case the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as the petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were nicely aware about the allegations and led the evidence as such this point more info is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
10. Without touching the merits from the case of the issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these types of yearly increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to become made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
share or interest of the co-owner in immovable property may also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer and even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
fourteen. From the light on the position explained over, it really is concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to become promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be viewed as for no fault of his own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the duration of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more